The cause of the storm
There was a bit of turmoil in library land this week after CILIP posted a blog post (Libraries, equality and the “turnaround decade”) which appeared to be supporting the Conservatives (at least that’s what it seemed like to me and many others). This resulted in a bit of personal turmoil and uncertainty to how I should react. Some people have cancelled their membership, should I?
After a twitterstorm, CILIP added a statement to the post to “provide clarification” which stated “the post and our tweets do not support or endorse Conservative policy”. I’m not going to explain why I had a problem with the post since Phil Bradley has already written a commentary which succinctly covers that – Oh dear, CILIP.
Alarm, confusion, disappointment
My first reaction to CILIP’s post was alarm. I’m not the most involved member of CILIP, but this did not seem to fit with the CILIP I knew and it’s not what I want CILIP to be. I don’t want to be part of an organisation which is seen to be supporting the conservatives (though I acknowledge that the additional statement clearly states CILIP does not). My next reaction was confusion. Are they trying to ingratiate CILIP with the government? Have they been fooled by Cameron and his words? Is this a new direction for CILIP? What’s going on? My third reaction was disappointment. I felt let down by an organisation I thought was supposed to be representing me. I started questioning whether I should remain a member of CILIP.
This got me thinking about what I get out of being a member of CILIP.
- Ejournals: The first thing that came to mind was access to ejournals. I don’t work in an academic library, and therefore my only access to subscription librarianship journals is via CILIP. I fairly frequently use the access to LISA and Sage journals that comes with my CILIP membership. Obviously there are various open access journals (thank you CIG!) I could read, but sometimes I come across an article I want that isn’t open access.
- Chartership: I’ve recently started the chartership process and it is really helping me focus, record and reflect on my CPD. Yes, I could do this without actually chartering, but on a selfish note I’d quite like the recognition for doing it. Then there’s the question of “what if a job came up requiring/desiring chartership and I hadn’t done it?”. I hope my current fixed term position will become permanent, but if not I’ll be job hunting in a year’s time.
- The VLE: The VLE has been an exciting development and I’m actually finding it useful. Yes, it has been a bit slow to get off the ground, but it now seems to be going in the right direction and I don’t want to miss out.
- My special interest groups (SIGs) and regional member network: I’ve always been more connected with my SIGs and regional network and I’ve been to far more SIG and regional events that national CILIP ones. I think it’s a combination of these events being either easier to get to (regional network) or entirely focused on something relevant to me (SIGs) and generally smaller, so less intimidating. I also enjoy the publications, the networking and being able to get involved.
- A sense of community: Finally, I get a real sense of community out of being a member of CILIP. Yes, I would still feel part of the profession if I left CILIP, but I think I would feel kind of left out. Maybe this is just my insecurities, but for me it’s a benefit of my membership.
This list made me realise how much I am actually getting out of CILIP. It seem’s unfair to leave CILIP and all that it is offering for one mistake (I’m hoping this is what it was). Phil Gorman tweeted from the CILIP New Professional’s Day.
— Phil Gorman (@philbgorman) October 9, 2015
Hopefully, we’ll all get to see something of Nick Poole’s talk soon.
Then there’s the case that you can’t change it if you’re not part of it. If the membership disagree with what CILIP is saying, we need to tell them. We’ve started that on Twitter this week, and there’s the well timed survey on CILIP’s Strategic Plan for 2016-2020 we can use too. I’ve already completed the survey, but will be sending an email outlining my concerns.