Thing 15: Librarianly events

This post was written for 23 Things for Professional Development, Thing 15: Attending, presenting at and organising seminars, conferences and other events.

Attending events is something I haven’t done a huge amount of, but I’m hoping to do quite a bit more of now I’m studying in London where so much seems to be happening.  This week I’ll be going to two events, one of which is all about attending the IFLA World Library and Information Congress.  Writing this post has also reminded me I was going to join the Cambridge Library Group as I now live near Cambridge and they seem to have some interesting events.  So far I’ve only been to events which have been free for me to attend (apart from travel costs), but I’m sure I will come across something soon that I really want to attend that isn’t free.

With the limited number of events I’ve attended so far, I wouldn’t feel confident enough quite yet to speak at an event, except perhaps an unconference.  Generally I’m someone who quite enjoys giving presentations and speaking in front of people as long I know what’s expected of me and think that the people I’m talking to will find what I’m saying interesting.  One problem I need to overcome is my recurring concern that as I’m new to the profession no one will be interested in what I’ve got to say – which really hasn’t been my experience during informal conversations with more experienced professionals.

As for organising something, I organised a meet up for cpd23 participants in Oxford a few months ago, but a proper event?  Maybe one day.

Thing 14 (part 2): Reference management, a library perspective

This post was written for 23 Things for Professional Development, Thing 14: Zotero / Mendeley / CiteULike.

My last post was all about the experience of using reference managers as a student.  This post is about my experience of librarians providing support for the use reference managers.

When I was working as a trainee at the Radcliffe Science Library I had the opportunity to get involved with some of the user education offered by the librarians.  I tested the worksheets that were given to participants at user education sessions and helped at the sessions as a demonstrator (i.e. when the participants were on the practical part of a workshop I went round answering questions).  There were some sessions which covered just reference management and some where reference management was just part of a session on research skills.  Some sessions were a compulsory part of the course, but most were advertised by the library and open to anyone.  Mostly they were aimed at undergraduates tackling their first research assignment and/or first year postgraduates.  One-to-one sessions with subject librarians was also available.  Different sessions used different software and certain departments had a preference for different software.  The full range of courses included RefWorks and EndNote which were provided by the university as well as the (currently) freely available Zotero and Mendeley.

There is also an online guide to reference management, with specific information on RefWorks, EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley and Colwiz at http://libguides.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/reference-management.  One of my projects during my trainee year was to research and produce this guide.

Thing 14 (part 1): Reference management, a personal perspective

This post was written for 23 Things for Professional Development, Thing 14: Zotero / Mendeley / CiteULike

You mean you do it all by hand!?

One thing that surprised me during my graduate trainee year was that hardly any of my fellow trainees had ever used reference management software before.  I had assumed that everyone who ever had to write a dissertation or coursework essay at university would have used it.  I now know this is not the case.  I think perhaps this is a subject thing.  I did a science degree and reference managers certainly seem popular with the students at the science library where I did my traineeship.  If this is the case I wonder why?  Do scientists have more references, do non-scientists have more references in unusual formats which reference managers don’t deal with so well or is it just that there is more awareness of reference managers in science?  Or does it depend which university you go to?  I’d be interested if anyone has any ideas on the matter or knows of reference managers being popular in other subjects.

Trials and tribulations of reference management

My first experience of reference management was a skills session on EndNote at the beginning of my third year of my undergraduate degree.  Interestingly this was given by an academic, not a librarian.   As getting EndNote on my laptop would have involved me parting with a hefty sum of money I decided to use EndNote Web (which I thought was freely available until went home for Christmas and found it was asking for my university log in!) for the references I needed for my third year and then fourth year projects.

EndNote Web was not perfect and one day while sat at a library computer getting thoroughly frustrated at the extremely long time it was taking to do something my lovely department librarian showed me Zotero.  I tried it out, but didn’t really like the interface so decided to stick with EndNote Web.  A decision I was later to regret when less than a week before my fourth year project was due to be handed in EndNote Web’s Cite While You Write (the bit that integrates with MS Word to create in text citations and bibliographies) stopped working and did something very strange to all my citations and my bibliography.  I sorted it out in the end via EndNote, but not without further complications and a lot of stress.  I haven’t heard of anyone else having similar problems with EndNote Web, and it may have had something to do with my old version of MS Word, but my relationship with EndNote Web was irreparably damaged and I changed allegiance to Zotero.

During my traineeship I used Mendeley for my references I used at work when writing biographies of the people we held archives of, but continued using Zotero to store other references.  I used Mendeley because it was the easiest thing to get to work without admin rights on the computer I was using and it did the job.  Now I’ve started my MA I’ve had another think about which reference manager I want to use.  I’ve settled on Zotero as it’s (currently) freely available so I will continue to be able to use it wherever I end up working in the future and it can import references from the UCL online catalogue and the bibliographic databases I’m most likely to use.  Although I did have to spend a couple of hours yesterday unsuccessfully trying to get it to work with OpenOffice (I don’t have MS Office on my laptop) and then giving up and downloading LibreOffice which I have managed to get Zotero to work with.

Why bother?

So, with all the stress and difficulties why do I still bother using a reference manager?  My main reason is to keep track of all the things that I’ve read so that I can find them again if I want to reference or re-read them.  I can store my references in folders so that I can find everything I read for a particular course in one place, I can add tags to my references which I can then search (one of the tags I use is ‘to read’, which I find very useful), I can add notes to the reference to summarise it, tell me which bit was useful or said something interesting, tell me why I read it, etc.  If I had to do it all by hand I just wouldn’t be as organised.  Oh, and (when it works) it does make formatting references much easier and quicker.

Thing 13: Collaborative working online

This post was written for 23 Things for Professional Development, Thing 13: Google Drive, Wikis and Dropbox.

This thing is focussed on tools for file sharing and collaborative working online – Google Drive, Dropbox and Wikis.  I’ve been using Google Drive (previously Google Docs) for several years both as a collaborative tool for committee and group work and as a way of accessing personal files on different computers without having to take a memory stick with me everywhere.  One big advantage of Google Drive as a collaborative tool, particularly for short-term projects or where documents are not shared frequently, is that most people already have a Google account.  This makes getting started with Google Drive easy and there isn’t that initial barrier of setting up yet another online account.

One feature of Google Drive I tried out that was new to me was the Google Drive download which puts a folder on my desktop containing all my files in Google Drive.  I’m glad I’ve found this as I quite like being able to access my documents without having to find the website and log on.

Dropbox was new to me, but it seems to be pretty similar to Google Drive.  Other than Google’s advantage of popularity I can’t see any real advantage of one over the other.  Dropbox looks nice, I like the interface and part of me thinks I already use too many Google services, but I think Google’s popularity (and therefore ease of sharing with people) is going to swing it for me.

Wiki’s aren’t new to me but they’ve never been part of my everyday work routines, though I can certainly see how a wiki could be just the right solution in certain situations.  I’ve contributed to the Library Day in the Life and UK Library Blogs wikis.  I’ve found these and the Library Routes Project wiki really useful sources of information.  They’re so simple to contribute to that lots of people do, which is what makes them great resources.  I’m definitely a fan of wikis.

cpd23 Oxford meet up – Wednesday 13th June

Are you taking part in cpd23 and would like to meet other participants?  Have you taken part in cpd23 previously and would like to share your wisdom with some newbies?  Or just like the idea of a sociable couple of hours with other library folk?  As next week is cpd23 ‘real life networks’ week I’m organising a meet up in Oxford next Wednesday 13th June from 5.15pm at The Mitre on the High Street.  Everyone welcome, cpd23 participant or not.